Published on:

When someone witnesses their loved one being seriously injured because of the negligent actions of another person or entity, they have a right to pursue compensation for the negligent infliction of emotional distress when what they witnessed traumatizes them. While this cause of action is typically used in cases involving someone who visually witnesses an incident and its aftermath, the California Supreme Court recently considered a case in which a woman’s mother heard the sounds of a serious car crash and was traumatized when she realized her daughter had suffered serious injuries. In Downey v. City of Riverside, Cal. Supreme Ct. Case No. S280322, the California Supreme Court decided whether the cause of action requires the plaintiff to have immediate awareness of the defendant’s negligence that caused their loved one’s accident and injuries.

Factual and Procedural Background

Jayde Downey was giving her daughter, Malyah Jane Vance, driving directions on her cell phone while Vance was driving. Vance was driving near the intersection of Via Zapata and Canyon Crest Drive at the time. While giving her instructions, Downey heard Vance exclaim “Oh!” followed by the sounds of breaking glass and crunching metal, so she immediately knew her daughter had been involved in a car crash. Since Vance did not respond any further, Downey knew that she had likely suffered severe injuries in the crash that prevented her from talking. A passerby picked up the phone and told Downey to stop talking because he needed to try to find her daughter’s pulse.

Published on:

Quick answer: Yes. Lane splitting is legal in California. Vehicle Code section 21658.1—added by Assembly Bill 51 and effective January 1, 2017—defines lane splitting and directs the California Highway Patrol (CHP) to publish safety guidelines for it. California is the only U.S. state that expressly permits riding between lanes of moving traffic. Notably, the statute itself sets no speed limit or speed-differential cap, and the CHP’s current guidance focuses on general safety principles rather than fixed numbers.

Lane splitting—riding a motorcycle between rows of slow or stopped vehicles traveling in the same direction—is a daily reality on California freeways and a frequent source of confusion for riders and drivers alike. Below is what the law actually says in 2026, how the CHP’s safety guidance works, and how lane splitting can affect fault if you’re injured in a crash.

Is Lane Splitting Legal in California?

Published on:

head-on-collision-attorney-Los-AngelesHead-on collisions are among the most dangerous types of motor vehicle accidents, often resulting in severe injuries or fatalities. In California, a state known for its extensive network of highways and roads, these accidents pose a significant threat to drivers and passengers alike. Understanding the causes, consequences, and preventive measures of head-on collisions is essential for promoting road safety. This blog post delves into the dangers of head-on collisions in California and offers practical advice on how to avoid them.

Understanding Head-On Collisions

A head-on collision occurs when two vehicles traveling in opposite directions crash into each other frontally. The force of impact is often immense due to the combined speed of both vehicles, making these accidents particularly catastrophic. Several factors contribute to the occurrence of head-on collisions, including driver error, road conditions, and environmental factors.

Published on:

In some situations, an employee of a subcontractor on a worksite might be able to file a lawsuit against the employer of another worker who injures them through third-party liability. However, the California Supreme Court has previously held that a company that hires an independent contractor is generally not liable to third parties injured because of the contractor’s negligence while working. In CBRE v. Superior Court of San Diego County, Cal. Ct. App. Case No. D083130, the Court of Appeal decided whether a worker who was injured on a worksite could file a lawsuit against the company that hired the general contractor that subcontracted with the worker’s employer when the worker was shocked by a live wire.

Factual and Procedural Background

Jake Johnson was an electrical foreman employed by PCF Electric (PCF). Property Reserve, Inc. (PRI) owned an office building that needed renovations to prepare for a new tenant. PRI signed the lease agreement with the new tenant on April 9, 2019, with the move-in scheduled for June 1. CBRE managed the building owned by PRI. PRI accepted a bid by Crew Builders to serve as the general contractor and perform the upgrades, and Crew hired PCF Electric as a subcontractor to perform the electrical work.

Published on:

By Steven M. Sweat, Personal Injury Lawyers, APC

30+ years of California personal injury practice  |  Super Lawyers since 2012  |  Avvo 10.0  |  Updated for 2026

Quick Answer: California personal injury law lets people who are hurt by another party’s negligence recover compensation for medical bills, lost income, and pain and suffering. The key 2026 rules: you generally have two years from the date of injury to file a lawsuit (Code of Civil Procedure § 335.1), but only six months to file a claim against a government entity. California follows a pure comparative negligence rule, so partial fault reduces but never eliminates your recovery. There is no cap on compensatory damages in ordinary injury cases — the only statutory cap applies to non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases, which rose to $470,000 (and $650,000 in wrongful death malpractice cases) on January 1, 2026.

 

Personal injury law in California exists to protect people who are physically or psychologically harmed because someone else failed to act with reasonable care. If you have been injured in a crash, a fall, or any other preventable accident, understanding your rights is the first step toward holding the responsible party accountable. This guide explains how California personal injury law works in 2026 — the deadlines, the fault rules, the damages available, and the steps that protect your claim.

What Counts as a Personal Injury Claim in California?

A personal injury claim arises when one party’s negligence — or, in some cases, intentional or reckless conduct — causes harm to another person. To recover compensation, an injured person generally must prove four elements:

  • Duty: The other party owed you a legal duty of reasonable care (for example, every driver owes other road users a duty to drive safely).
  • Breach: They failed to meet that duty.
  • Causation: That failure actually caused your injury.
  • Damages: You suffered real, measurable harm as a result.

Common situations that give rise to personal injury claims include car and other motor vehicle accidents, slip and fall incidents, defective products, workplace injuries, and medical malpractice. If you are unsure whether your situation qualifies, our guide on whether you have a valid personal injury case walks through the threshold questions.

The Filing Deadline: California’s Statute of Limitations

A statute of limitations is the legal deadline for filing a lawsuit. Miss it, and your claim is almost always barred forever — no matter how strong it is. The most important deadlines in California are:

  • Most personal injury claims — two years. Under Code of Civil Procedure § 335.1, you have two years from the date of injury to file suit.
  • Claims against a government entity — six months. If your injury involves a city, county, the state, a public bus, a government employee, or a dangerous public road, you must file a formal administrative claim within six months under Government Code § 911.2 — long before the two-year court deadline.
  • Medical malpractice — one or three years. Under Code of Civil Procedure § 340.5, the deadline is generally one year from when you discovered (or reasonably should have discovered) the injury, or three years from the date of injury, whichever comes first.
  • Injured minors. For most injury claims, the deadline is paused (tolled) while the injured person is under 18 (Code of Civil Procedure § 352).
  • The discovery rule. When an injury is not immediately apparent, the clock may not start until you knew or should have known you were harmed.

Because these deadlines vary and the government-claim window is so short, it is dangerous to wait. For a full breakdown, see our detailed explanation of the California statute of limitations and its exceptions.

Pure Comparative Negligence: How Fault Affects Your Recovery

California follows a pure comparative negligence rule, established in Li v. Yellow Cab Co., 13 Cal. 3d 804 (1975). Under this doctrine, you can recover damages even if you were partially — or mostly — at fault for your own injury. Your compensation is simply reduced by your percentage of fault.

For example, if a jury finds your total damages are $100,000 but assigns you 30% of the fault, you recover $70,000. Even a person found 99% at fault can still recover 1% of their damages. This is one of the most plaintiff-friendly fault systems in the country — and it is precisely why insurance companies work so hard to shift blame onto injured victims.

What Damages Can You Recover?

California law allows injured people to recover several categories of damages:

  • Economic damages — quantifiable financial losses such as medical bills (past and future), lost wages, lost earning capacity, and out-of-pocket costs. These are never capped in California.
  • Non-economic damages — pain and suffering, emotional distress, disfigurement, and loss of enjoyment of life. In ordinary injury cases (car crashes, falls, defective products, and the like), these are also not capped.
  • Punitive damages — available in cases involving malice, oppression, or fraud under Civil Code § 3294, and intended to punish especially egregious conduct rather than to compensate the victim.

The One Important Exception: The MICRA Cap on Medical Malpractice

The only major statutory cap in California injury law applies to non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases, under the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA). For decades that cap was frozen at $250,000 — but Assembly Bill 35 changed that, effective January 1, 2023, replacing the flat figure with a schedule of annual increases.

As of January 1, 2026, the MICRA cap on non-economic damages is:

  • $470,000 for medical malpractice cases that do not involve death; and
  • $650,000 for medical malpractice wrongful death cases.

Both figures increase every January 1 — by $40,000 and $50,000 respectively — until they reach $750,000 and $1,000,000 in 2033. Critically, this cap applies only to medical malpractice. It does not limit recovery in car accident, premises liability, or other standard personal injury claims, and it never caps economic damages like medical expenses or lost income.

Common Types of Personal Injury Cases

Our firm handles the full range of California injury claims, including:

  • Car and motor vehicle accidents — the most common source of injury claims in Los Angeles and throughout California.
  • Premises liability — injuries caused by a property owner’s failure to maintain safe conditions, including slip and fall accidents, negligent security, and inadequate lighting.
  • Catastrophic and wrongful death cases — traumatic brain injuries, spinal cord injuries, and the loss of a loved one due to another’s negligence.

Steps to Take After You Are Injured

  1. Seek medical attention immediately. Your health comes first, and prompt treatment also creates the medical record that documents your injuries.
  2. Document everything. Photograph the scene and your injuries, obtain a police or incident report, and gather the names and contact information of any witnesses.
  3. Be careful what you say to insurers. Adjusters are trained to minimize payouts. You are not required to give a recorded statement before speaking with your own attorney.
  4. Note your deadlines. Remember the six-month government-claim window if a public entity may be involved.
  5. Consult a personal injury attorney. A free consultation costs you nothing and helps you understand whether your claim is worth pursuing.

How a California Personal Injury Attorney Helps

Insurance companies defend these claims with experienced adjusters and defense lawyers from the moment an incident is reported. An attorney levels that playing field — investigating liability, preserving evidence, retaining experts, calculating the full value of your losses (including future care), and negotiating from a position of strength. California personal injury attorneys, including our firm, work on a contingency fee basis: you pay nothing up front and no fee at all unless we recover compensation for you.

A Track Record That Reflects Real Results

Over more than 30 years, our firm has recovered compensation for injured Californians across a wide range of cases. A few examples from our verified case results:

  • $2,000,000 — auto accident on the 110 freeway resulting in spinal fusion surgery.
  • $1,300,000 — premises liability slip-and-fall resulting in wrongful death.
  • $1,000,000 — motorcycle accident on the 405 freeway.

These results are illustrative and do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of any other matter. Every case is different.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the statute of limitations for a personal injury claim in California?

Most California personal injury claims must be filed within two years of the date of injury under Code of Civil Procedure § 335.1. Claims against a government entity require a formal administrative claim within six months, and medical malpractice claims follow a separate one-year/three-year deadline.

Is there a cap on personal injury damages in California?

No, not in ordinary injury cases. California does not cap economic or non-economic damages in claims like car accidents or premises liability. The only major statutory cap applies to non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases — $470,000 for non-death cases and $650,000 for wrongful death cases as of January 1, 2026.

What does “pure comparative negligence” mean?

It means you can recover damages even if you were partly at fault for your injury. Your compensation is reduced by your percentage of fault, but it is never eliminated — even a person 99% at fault may recover 1% of their damages (Li v. Yellow Cab Co., 1975).

How long do I have to file a claim against a government entity?

Just six months. Under Government Code § 911.2, you must file a written administrative claim within six months of the injury before you can sue a city, county, the state, or another public entity — far shorter than the standard two-year deadline.

How much does a California personal injury lawyer cost?

Nothing up front. California personal injury attorneys typically work on a contingency fee basis, meaning the initial consultation is free and you owe no attorney’s fee unless and until compensation is recovered for you.

Talk to a California Personal Injury Attorney

If you or a loved one has been injured by someone else’s negligence — in a car accident, a fall, or any other preventable incident — knowing your rights is the first step, and acting before your deadline runs is the most important one. Steven M. Sweat, Personal Injury Lawyers, APC offers free, no-obligation consultations throughout California. Call our toll-free helpline at 866-966-5240 to discuss your case.

Published on:

Introduction

Navigating the aftermath of a car accident in California can be a daunting journey filled with complex legal, medical, and insurance challenges. With the bustling highways and streets across cities like Los Angeles, San Francisco, and San Diego, the state sees a significant number of vehicular accidents each year. These incidents range from minor fender benders to catastrophic collisions, leaving many to deal with severe injuries, financial burdens, and emotional trauma. This post aims to underscore the importance of securing a skilled accident attorney to guide victims through these challenging times, ensuring they receive the justice and compensation they deserve.

Understanding California’s Traffic Laws and Legal System

Published on:

Service companies, such as an HVAC company or roofing company, often complete projects on-site at residential or commercial buildings. The working conditions in different homes can be unknown or hazardous. Technicians receive safety training to prepare for whatever may come their way, but accidents still happen. When a technician gets hurt while performing a service at a home, is the homeowner or the small business owner responsible for the damages?

A recent case out of Los Angeles put a spotlight on this very topic, and it set a precedent for the courts that can inform us of what to expect if we experience a similar incident.

Learn more about who is responsible when a technician is injured at a client’s home.

Published on:

In California, plaintiffs have the burden of proving all of the elements of negligence when they file personal injury lawsuits. This includes presenting evidence that the defendant’s negligent conduct caused the plaintiff’s injuries and resulting losses. It is often necessary to present expert witness testimony to prove causation. When a defendant objects to a plaintiff’s witness being qualified to testify as an expert, the court must evaluate the witness’s testimony under the substantial factors standard. In Brancati v. Cachuma Village, Inc., Cal. Ct. App. Case No. B321616, the California Court of Appeal considered whether a trial court erred when it found that a plaintiff’s proposed expert witness was not qualified to testify about causation.

Factual and Procedural Background

Dana Brancati signed a month-to-month apartment lease with Cachuma Village, Inc. in 2012 and continued to live there from April 2012 to April 2016. While she lived there, she complained to her landlord about mold in her apartment and the company’s failure to remediate the issue. In 2016, Insight Environmental assessed Brancati’s apartment and found high levels of several species of toxic mold on her premises. She then filed a lawsuit against Chachuma Village, alleging the company had breached the warranty of habitability, constructively evicted her, caused her personal injuries, and committed fraud. Brancati attributed her respiratory illnesses to the toxic mold and claimed $500,000 in damages.

Published on:

California’s vast roadways are guided by the California Vehicle Code (CVC), which sets the standards for how drivers should behave on the road. Let’s dive deeper into some essential sections of the CVC to better understand California’s traffic laws.

1. Cell Phones and Distracted Driving

  • Hands-free Only: Per CVC §23123, drivers are prohibited from holding and using a cell phone unless it’s set up for hands-free use. This includes activities like texting and calling.
Published on:

In California, bars, restaurants, and other establishments that are open to the public owe a duty of care to patrons to keep them reasonably safe and free from danger. This includes a duty to keep customers safe from other, potentially dangerous customers. In

Glynn v. Orange Circle Lounge Inc., Ca. Ct. App. Case No. G061255, the Court of Appeal considered the scope of the duty a bar owed to a guest who was stabbed to death in a fight an hour after he left the bar when the original fight began inside of the bar.

Factual and Procedural Background

Contact Information