On the morning of March 29th, a software developer by the name of Chris Bucchere was commuting to work on his bike. As he approached the intersection in an area of the city used by many pedestrians, he ran through a red light and struck a 71 year-old man attempting to cross the street. Nearby surveillance cameras caught the incident on tape allowing officials to estimate the cyclist’s speed at approximately 35 miles per hour or more. A story in the New York Times attributed statements to the cyclist as follows: “I laid it down and just plowed through the crosswalk in the least crowded place I could find.” In a fairly unprecedented move, the bike rider was later charged and entered a plea agreement on criminal charges of vehicular manslaughter.
What Can This Incident Teach Us About The Laws As They Relate to Bicycles and Persons Traveling on Foot?
This incident implicates many provisions of California statutes including the California Vehicle Code and the Penal Code. The most important of these, in my opinion as an attorney that has represented both cyclists and pedestrians in injury claims, are the following:
- California Vehicle Code 21200 is probably the single most implicated vehicle code section in this accident scenario. It states that, “a person riding a bicycle … has all the rights … and is subject to all the provisions applicable to the driver of a vehicle.”
- California Penal Code 192 defines misdemeanor “vehicular manslaughter” as committing a misdemeanor or infraction while driving a vehicle resulting the death of another individual. It further defines felony or “gross vehicular manslaughter” as the commission of an unlawful act or a lawful act in an unlawful manner while driving a vehicle which causes death of another individual as a result of the defendant’s “gross negligence.” “Gross negligence” is defined in that code as acting in a reckless manner that causes a “high risk of death or great bodily injury.”
- In addition, California Vehicle Code 21950(a) requires all drivers of “vehicles” to yield the right of way to pedestrians lawfully crossing a street either within a crosswalk or at an intersection that doesn’t have a crosswalk. Obviously, it is also unlawful to run a red light and probably negligent to try to “beat out” a light about to turn red.
The analysis in this scenario would be that the bike rider (a “Vehicle” just like a car, truck motorcycle or any other “vehicle” as defined by California law), if he ran the red light or failed to come to a complete stop prior to the crosswalk and at the limit line prior to the light turning red, was guilty of at least an infraction. The fact that he apparently saw pedestrians in the crosswalk and proceeded to “plow through” would be an additional infraction and may also show both negligence and “reckless” conduct causing a “risk of great bodily harm or death.”
From a civil liability standpoint, the cyclist may also be subject to both wrongful death damages for the loss of a loved one and the economic support associated with the decedent but, may also subject himself to punitive damages. The civil standard for punitive damages is conduct, which shows a “conscious disregard for the rights and safety of others” under California Civil Code 3294.
The conclusion to be drawn is that bikers need to realize that they have all the “rights” of vehicles but, also all the same responsibilities!
Sources:
New York Times, U.S. Edition, July 15, 2013 – “After Death, Manslaughter Charge for Cyclist”
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Study on the Effect of Speed on Pedestrian Accidents and Fatalities, http://www.walkinginfo.org/pedsafe/crashstats.cfm
Top 10 Most Important Laws For Bicyclists in California: http://www.victimslawyer.com/most-important-california-laws-bike-riders/